From 070c5ce5688df6b755e2f99d3c4fd834ea813f12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pranam Lashkari <lpranam@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:51:16 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] leaflet: resolved Choosing Solid transparency for a shape
 makes no difference

Change-Id: Iac72fbe4b31f0844df469c87c2ead598ed0cbe1a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/online/+/93202
Tested-by: Jenkins CollaboraOffice <jenkinscollaboraoffice@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andras Timar <andras.timar@collabora.com>
---
 loleaflet/src/control/Control.JSDialogBuilder.js | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/loleaflet/src/control/Control.JSDialogBuilder.js b/loleaflet/src/control/Control.JSDialogBuilder.js
index ce201afdd..2390d11e1 100644
--- a/loleaflet/src/control/Control.JSDialogBuilder.js
+++ b/loleaflet/src/control/Control.JSDialogBuilder.js
@@ -1120,13 +1120,6 @@ L.Control.JSDialogBuilder = L.Control.extend({
 				return String(state.replace(',', '.') / 100.0);
 			}
 			break;
-
-		case 'transtype':
-			state = items.getItemValue('.uno:FillFloatTransparence');
-			if (state) {
-				return builder._gradientStyleToLabel(state.style);
-			}
-			break;
 		}
 
 		return null;