From c23b37f352ec3ddf83f4d4d4a8ab1290368113fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pranav Kant <pranavk@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:12:52 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] loleaflet: Better to have 'reconnected' signal here

Change-Id: I50c9484bb591d7192977fe49adb75f99d8ee1b08
---
 loleaflet/src/core/Socket.js | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/loleaflet/src/core/Socket.js b/loleaflet/src/core/Socket.js
index 3971f3e09..e9a64f53b 100644
--- a/loleaflet/src/core/Socket.js
+++ b/loleaflet/src/core/Socket.js
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ L.Socket = L.Class.extend({
 		} else if (textMsg.startsWith('status:')) {
 			// we are reconnecting ...
 			this._map._docLayer._onMessage('invalidatetiles: EMPTY', null);
-			this._map.fire('statusindicator', {statusType: 'finish'});
+			this._map.fire('statusindicator', {statusType: 'reconnected'});
 			this._map.setPermission(this._map.options.permission);
 		}