One has to love arbitrary retry counts and timeouts. Loading the
password-protected.ods in a loolkit process, with correct password
provided, takes 12 seconds on my machine. I think this slowness is
because the NSS code LO uses to do crypto wants to initialize its
crypto goodness in various ways that don't work so well inside a
chroot jail. Presumably it uses some wait with timeout when attempting
to do something which doesn't succeed. For instance it tries to run
netstat -in. (In an interactive LibreOffice the doc loads fairly
instantly.) Oh well.
It does three separate things, and the first two intentionally result
in errors, and the server probably disconnects after errors. Not
sure. This is horrible, horrible.
Having a separate "disconnect" message is a disgrace. There should be
no need for it. WebSocket has a perfectly fine graceful disconnect
mechanism already (CLOSE frames). The code needs to be prepared to
receive a CLOSE frame at any time. The code also needs to be prepared
for the underlying socket being bluntly closed by the other end,
without sending any WebSocket CLOSE frame. The only sane thing is to
handle a "disconnect" message in the same way as those situations
anyway, so why is it needed?
Sort #includes and using statements. Use 'using' consistently for all
Poco:: types. (I am not 100% convinced that using 'using' like done
here in loolwsd was a good idea after all. But at least let's be
consistent now that we do use it.)
No need to pass the value of a variable, initialised much earlier, to
a system call when one can pass the required constant value as
such. Much clearer.
Sorry, could not resist. Obviously not very important.
In retrospect, maybe it would have been better to have as policy to
*not* use any 'using Poco::Foo'. Now there is an inconsistent mix of
writing out the complete type and using a 'using'. Plus copy-pasted
long lists of 'usings'. And of course, one should never have 'using'
in an include file. Oh well.
This is possible by moving all the password handling logic to
Document container class. When a user opens a password protected
document the first time, it saves all possible data such as
password, password type etc. Upon opening the same document
again, password is matched with the cached password saved in the
document container class before allowing the new view access to
this document.
Change-Id: Id1f2b6e06de806564bf865e83fed51b01c9a0fbc
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/22208
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Sometimes there are situations when `connection` map is filled
with dead sessions. We don't want to deal with those dead ones.
Change-Id: I00dda77c39b5adbba69421eace0be0159e02505c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/22207
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
There are 5 LOK callbacks currently that are triggered on LOKit,
and not on LOKitDocument. These include status indicators, and
document password callbacks during document load. Lets move all
the callbacks called during document load in the Document container
itself, and keep the callbacks called after document load in the
Child session.
Change-Id: I8e43c2baaa12023b34822954dd494780ee6dd7ca
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/22206
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Don't let them hanging around, otherwise we would keep sending
messages to a dead peer (ToClient) indefinitely.
Change-Id: I9d4bb6edee351bd31f1faa30deaa4f37c3c7d031
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/22465
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Our DocumentCallback is smart enough which checks all the
running connections, and send the callback notification to all of
them. Registering the callback only during the first loadDocument
call should be enough.
Change-Id: I82bcb9525814dae14def3bfb6c088337d0d0ea3c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/22202
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
