size_t in C and in C++ are not necessarily the same
type. The C++ size_t is in the std namespace. Since
we do include many C headers, and indeed some C++
runtime headers do define size_t for backwards
compatibility, it's easy to mix and match the two
types.
Also, 'using std::size_t;' isn't a great practice,
so removed.
This is not exhaustive, just some low-hanging cases.
Change-Id: I85a36b6fd1acd204274b1869de9bcb94c8b3cf13
Signed-off-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashod.nakashian@collabora.co.uk>
More readable and typically more efficient.
Change-Id: I9bd5bfc91f4ac255bb8ae0987708fb8b56b398f8
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/online/+/95285
Reviewed-by: Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins
Tested-by: Jenkins CollaboraOffice <jenkinscollaboraoffice@gmail.com>
LibreOffice core uses that, too, and we support an even more
restricted set of compilers.
Change-Id: I0d0e2c8608e323eb5ef0f35ee8c46d02ab49a745
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/online/+/92467
Tested-by: Jenkins CollaboraOffice <jenkinscollaboraoffice@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tor Lillqvist <tml@collabora.com>
Because the new-style tests are intrustive,
the exception that CppUnit throws on assertion
failures is caught and processed with the
application logic, which is far from ideal,
because it's very difficult to find the
cause of failure.
What we'd like is a way to control what happens
when an test assertion fails, such that we can
properly log/print the failure, and even break
in the debugger.
The new macros allow us to control the behavior
at compile-time and have added flexibility.
For now, they log an assertion failure before
invoking the CPPUNIT macro, and support a
compile-time directive to assert, which is
useful for breaking in the debugger.
Change-Id: If464ba246e3ec747f31496a4215cb73ef735dfaf
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/online/+/87625
Tested-by: Jenkins CollaboraOffice <jenkinscollaboraoffice@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@collabora.com>
