Delaying the splitting maximizes the chances
that we will deduplicate and combine them
in the queue optimally.
Change-Id: Ib721fe7596de7ad5d34159949fe75f16e861eb24
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/29287
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Even the order of the views matters when the editing is happening.
Change-Id: Id0868a8198f9fa955512fccba57fa063eab46e8c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/29284
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
When putting tiles into the queue, do only the de-duplication,
reprioritization is better at the get() time - no need to keep shuffling
the priorities according to the cursor moves etc. all the time.
The tile combination then does the rest of the work for us :-)
Change-Id: I100c433dd3b24228d1ca8e4c89891635db1115c1
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/29283
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
It confuses me that 'it' is a reference, while 'payload' is a value, so
even if payload is a const value that's never written, it's not OK to
change it to a reference, as the underlying memory is released by the
in-between erase() call.
Change-Id: I05ad0f64e3eeedf847b74a6fadff610fc7469aa1
A new queue with own thread now processes tile requests
so we have a chance to cull backlogged tile requests
that have since been invalidated.
This reduces load on the server significantly, especially
with multiple view at different zoom levels, and very fast
typing.
Change-Id: I6599939cd363dc71c30187f40d542aa37260dc56
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/28607
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Introduce a bit of hierarchy there, at some stage we'll want to re-order the
tile requests a bit so that it works better for collaborative editing; for the
moment, removing the duplicate entries is enough.
