A source file (.cpp) must include its own header first.
This insures that the header is self-contained and
doesn't depend on arbitrary (and accidental) includes
before it to compile.
Furthermore, system headers should go next, followed by
C then C++ headers, then libraries (Poco, etc) and, finally,
project headers come last.
This makes sure that headers and included in the same dependency
order to avoid side-effects. For example, Poco should never rely on
anything from our project in the same way that a C header should
never rely on anything in C++, Poco, or project headers.
Also, includes ought to be sorted where possible, to improve
readability and avoid accidental duplicates (of which there
were a few).
Change-Id: I62cc1343e4a091d69195e37ed659dba20cfcb1ef
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/25262
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Also, don't let these tile previews change part of the document
permanently. This is a temporary solution till we have some
better API from LOKit to deal with such a situation.
Change-Id: I8dfefd2b7ad8cf3e7a57afb95b57994ef0bb3b6c
editlock= is always the last parameter. This fixes the slide
previews in impress documents for editing session.
Change-Id: I3531c7f52e09e655524fa0afd6fe66da504b5d70
Obviously this is dangerous, since the id is not part of the
subscription key (the filename) so different clients could
have different ids on the same part, but in practice I
expect this not to happen. Though that clearly depends on
how clients use the id.
Change-Id: I52a0b043c9b5e5ad1111b692e4216cc9ffec5b2b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/24680
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
bccu#1433, bccu#1757 related.
Piggyback editlock information to tile messages so that kit can
use that information to allow changing parts only for messages
with editlock.
... and decline tile render request for tile messages without editlock
information
Change-Id: I9cedb870cd977741375665cb258d04c818481a14
For the moment, it will allow running 'make check' that does not conflict with
an already running loolwsd (eg. from 'make run'). Later we can consider
running more tests in parallel.
WSD's DocumentBroker and Kit's Document now handle
the communication of tiles as well as all aspects
of rendering, caching, unifying requests and
distributing results etc.
Change-Id: Ie22fbaaae26b91185ee348ec7077f30430eec0f6
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/24640
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
While there are two separate callbacks registered
(one with lokit and the other with lokitDocument,)
there is no reason why they should be handled
separately (and indeed differently).
The lokit callback only sends notifications on
status indicator (during loading and saving)
and document password type (if protected).
Due to the different callback handlers
the status indicator was only sent to the
first client, not all (as one expects).
Furthermore, because the lokit callback
was processed on the Core thread, it
was bound to cause performance and
thread-safety issues. Specifically it
deadlocked when another callback was
in flight when a save issued status
indicator callback.
By unifying the callbacks and putting
all callback messages on the message
queue we avoid all of the above and
simplify the code.
Change-Id: I5bd790b6ce88b7939186c1ec1dead7fb6cabf7e0
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/24522
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
When loading a document first we set the rendering
options. Beyond that, the document is shared and
we shouldn't change the rendering options.
Change-Id: I0d2ac6fc43553b8395111ba2b8a3cc2796d2f0a4
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/24470
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
The closing handshake.
Either peer can send a control frame with data containing
a specified control sequence to begin the closing handshake.
Upon receiving such a frame, the other peer sends a
Close frame in response, if it hasn't already sent one.
When inside the chroot, what we would need to do is remove everything
below / . But doing that is a bit too risky, in case some developer
screws up some detail and that code happens to run outside the chroot
after all, and the developer's machine gets trashed. So just remove
paths we can reasonably assume won't exist as global pathnames on a
developer machine: loSubPath and JAILED_DOCUMENT_ROOT.
Currently the actual complete cleanup of loolkit jails happens in
loolwsd when it is exiting. That is a bug and will have to be
fixed. It should be done in loolforkit as soon as possible after the
loolkit process has exited.
This ensures that bundled fonts in instdir/share end up resolved to
the same path that they were in when the forkit font config was setup.
It may also help locate other pre-inited resources.
Also copy in ~/.fonts in debug mode - can't hurt.
SocketProcessor doesn't need to take response
instance, since by the time it is called we
are already upgraded to WebSocket and it's
too late to set a request-level status.
Change-Id: Id95087e60354a50148c88427130613356679cf82
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/24110
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Connection thread should not attempt to disconnect the session,
which in turn will try to unload the document, which will
wait on the connection to destroy. The latter will never
happen since the connection destructor must, correctly,
wait for its thread to finish, which is waiting on itself now.
Since the session disconnect is already called from the session
destructor, there is no need to explicitly invoke it here.
Change-Id: Iaf9e8a10d4caa9001208084e909a14b4d4c5105e
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/23966
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
This seems to get rid of the "terminate called after throwing an
instance of 'Poco::SystemException'" problem for me at least.
Sigh. Why can't the compiler warn about such things? I build with
clang++ -Wall -Wextra. The Connection class is fully defined inside
the LOOLKit.cpp so it should be able to, right?
Presumably it is only developers that are interested in signals, and
terms like SEGV or ABRT are more precise than their textual
descriptions like "Segmentation violation" or "Aborted".
Sleep a second before exiting in case we get a fatal signal just when
about to finish, which sadly seems to happen often. (In fact, if
handleFatalSignal() is running at the same time, it will kill the
process so we never get to the _Exit() call.)
