As there isn't support (yet) to send files
asynchronously, when the socket native buffer
is small, asynchronous writes naturally return
EWOULDBLOCK. As a temp solution, we send files
synchronously, so there is no need to poll.
This should be replaced witha file-server
polling/serving thread that is dedicated to
sending files only (which closes the connection
when done).
Change-Id: I062fea44bfe54ab8d147b745da97bd499bf00657
SSL only requests what to poll for next.
So it's more accurate to rename ReadOrWrite
to Neither, since in that case SSL really
isn't blocked on either read or write.
Change-Id: I62dd4f94730d51666a7661b10a9d582d69fbf45e
We don't need a special "WebSocket" class, as websocket itself is just an
upgrade of an existing socket / connection, and trying to come up with a
concept where a Socket class magically upgrades to a WebSocket class would be
messy.
So let's have just a WebSocketHandler, that communicates over a StreamSocket
or SslStreamSocket, and be done with that :-)
Change-Id: I449e4d662fbe2c5b1789e308053e4a71376fe481
Introduce the appropriate interface instead of the template, so that we can
de-couple the ResponseClient from the Socket itself.
Change-Id: I21892bbce5d83a18ca580a25cfc2efbb05b08705
