Not sure whether the shutdown() implementation matches real shutdown()
semantics, especially with regards to the behaviour of poll(), read(),
and write() (on both the socket itself and the connectd one)
afterwards. But let's see.
The feed() API turned out to be not needed. (And in any case, it was
suposed to be completely equivalent to writing to the peer socket.)
It's easier to either call the function to set the logging callback,
or not, in one place in client code, than to comment in and out all
the logging lines in FakeSocket.cpp as needed.
Change-Id: Id17f7e461c7df817440b47cb3124fcece13b189b
As we use #ifdefs at all call sites anyway (because we don't dare use
the generic overrides of close() etc), we can leave out the parameters
related to actual BSD sockets that we ignore anyway.
"Real" Online always uses non-blocking sockets. We don't need to take
flags for that or check it. We can hardcode such behaviour always.
(Assuing that is what we want; let's see once something works.)
Change-Id: I6863907d71c5599b00ce1f8305a44d41bbaf7bee
That is how Online uses the sockets for communication between the
processes anyway: It send and receives complete WebSocket frames.
Sure, in the mobile case there is just one process, but (I think) we
want to keep the same basic structure anyway, even if "wsd" and "kit"
are just threads. (We probably also want to drop the WebSocket framing
of the messages.)
Change-Id: I2397f321029c1cbbbc448a9b2403ad185a51cf14
Intended as a replacement for the real sockets used for WebSocket IPC
in Online on Linux. The idea is that in a mobile app we don't want to
bother with any actual sockets or WebSocket protocol (because we are
running as a single process after all), but keep much of the code that
thinks it is using such mostly unmodified. Just an idea so far, let's
see how this turns out.
Change-Id: I7878b0db99d9cbf70650227186c1fec9677fa74b
