remove an OSL_ENSURE because absence of value is valid in classes derived Sprm
This commit is contained in:
parent
1a7b81940d
commit
208975bbb7
1 changed files with 2 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
|
|||
*
|
||||
* $RCSfile: DomainMapperTableManager.cxx,v $
|
||||
*
|
||||
* $Revision: 1.3 $
|
||||
* $Revision: 1.4 $
|
||||
*
|
||||
* last change: $Author: fridrich_strba $ $Date: 2007-05-04 13:29:20 $
|
||||
* last change: $Author: fridrich_strba $ $Date: 2007-05-04 14:21:31 $
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The Contents of this file are made available subject to
|
||||
* the terms of GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1.
|
||||
|
@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ bool DomainMapperTableManager::sprm(doctok::Sprm & rSprm)
|
|||
bRet = true;
|
||||
sal_uInt32 nId = rSprm.getId();
|
||||
doctok::Value::Pointer_t pValue = rSprm.getValue();
|
||||
OSL_ENSURE(pValue.get(), "no pointer to value");
|
||||
sal_Int32 nIntValue = ((pValue.get() != NULL) ? pValue->getInt() : 0);
|
||||
/* WRITERFILTERSTATUS: table: table_sprmdata */
|
||||
switch( nId )
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue