office-gobmx/compilerplugins/clang/postfixincrementfix.cxx
Luboš Luňák 276953ef21 remove not needed #include
Change-Id: I0fa791733407199db5be2cc9606ac9be1da64188
2013-02-02 22:59:45 +01:00

166 lines
6.3 KiB
C++

/*
* This file is part of the LibreOffice project.
*
* Based on LLVM/Clang.
*
* This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
* License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
*
*/
#include "postfixincrementfix.hxx"
/*
This is a rewriter.
Change all postfix ++ operators of non-trivial types to prefix if possible.
*/
namespace loplugin
{
PostfixIncrementFix::PostfixIncrementFix( ASTContext& context, Rewriter& rewriter )
: RewritePlugin( context, rewriter )
{
}
void PostfixIncrementFix::run()
{
TraverseDecl( context.getTranslationUnitDecl());
}
bool PostfixIncrementFix::VisitFunctionDecl( FunctionDecl* declaration )
{
if( ignoreLocation( declaration ))
return true;
if( !declaration->doesThisDeclarationHaveABody())
return true;
StmtParents parents;
fixPostfixOperators( declaration->getBody(), parents );
return true;
}
void PostfixIncrementFix::fixPostfixOperators( const Stmt* stmt, StmtParents& parents )
{
if( const CXXOperatorCallExpr* op = dyn_cast<CXXOperatorCallExpr>( stmt ))
{ // postfix ++ has two arguments (the operand and the hidden extra int)
if( op->getOperator() == OO_PlusPlus && op->getNumArgs() == 2 )
fixPostfixOperator( op, parents );
}
// For primitive types it would be UnaryOperatorExpr, but probably no good reason to change those.
parents.push_back( stmt );
for( ConstStmtIterator it = stmt->child_begin();
it != stmt->child_end();
++it )
{
if( *it != NULL ) // some children can be apparently NULL
fixPostfixOperators( *it, parents );
}
assert( parents.back() == stmt );
parents.pop_back();
}
void PostfixIncrementFix::fixPostfixOperator( const CXXOperatorCallExpr* op, StmtParents& parents )
{
if( !canChangePostfixToPrefix( op, parents, parents.size() - 1 ))
return;
if( !shouldDoChange( op->getArg( 0 )))
return;
// Adding spaces around the moved ++ should not be necessary
// (there might a problem with e.g. a+b++ -> a+++b (i.e. a++ +b),
// but we don't change such expressions).
if( insertText( op->getLocStart(), "++" )) // insert is intentionally first, in case it fails
removeText( op->getCallee()->getSourceRange());
}
bool PostfixIncrementFix::canChangePostfixToPrefix( const CXXOperatorCallExpr* op, StmtParents& parents, int parent_pos )
{
// check if foo++ can be safely replaced by ++foo
switch( parents[ parent_pos ]->getStmtClass())
{
case Stmt::CompoundStmtClass:
return true;
// these mean somebody is going to use it
case Stmt::ImplicitCastExprClass:
case Stmt::MaterializeTemporaryExprClass:
case Stmt::BinaryOperatorClass:
case Stmt::UnaryOperatorClass:
case Stmt::CallExprClass:
case Stmt::CXXOperatorCallExprClass:
return false;
case Stmt::CXXBindTemporaryExprClass:
// tricky, it may just mean the temporary will be cleaned up
// (by ExprWithCleanups), ignore and go up
assert( parent_pos > 0 ); // should not happen
return canChangePostfixToPrefix( op, parents, parent_pos - 1 );
case Stmt::ExprWithCleanupsClass:
// cleanup of a temporary, should be harmless (if the use
// of the postfix ++ operator here relies on the fact that
// the dtor for the object will be called, that's pretty insane
// code). Ignore and go up.
assert( parent_pos > 0 ); // should not happen
return canChangePostfixToPrefix( op, parents, parent_pos - 1 );
case Stmt::ParenExprClass: // parentheses, go up
assert( parent_pos > 0 );
return canChangePostfixToPrefix( op, parents, parent_pos - 1 );
case Stmt::IfStmtClass:
return canChangeInConditionStatement( op, cast< IfStmt >( parents[ parent_pos ] )->getCond(),
parents, parent_pos );
case Stmt::WhileStmtClass:
return canChangeInConditionStatement( op, cast< WhileStmt >( parents[ parent_pos ] )->getCond(),
parents, parent_pos );
case Stmt::DoStmtClass:
return canChangeInConditionStatement( op, cast< DoStmt >( parents[ parent_pos ] )->getCond(),
parents, parent_pos );
case Stmt::ForStmtClass:
return canChangeInConditionStatement( op, dyn_cast< ForStmt >( parents[ parent_pos ] )->getCond(),
parents, parent_pos );
default:
report( DiagnosticsEngine::Fatal, "cannot analyze operator++ (plugin needs fixing)",
op->getLocStart()) << parents[ parent_pos ]->getSourceRange();
// parents[ parent_pos ]->dump();
// parents[ std::max( parent_pos - 3, 0 ) ]->dump();
return false;
}
}
bool PostfixIncrementFix::canChangeInConditionStatement( const CXXOperatorCallExpr* op, const Expr* condition,
const StmtParents& parents, int parent_pos )
{
// cannot be changed in condition, can be changed in statements
if( parent_pos == parents.size() - 1 )
return op != condition;
else
{ // indirect child
assert( parent_pos + 1 < parents.size());
return parents[ parent_pos + 1 ] != condition;
}
}
bool PostfixIncrementFix::shouldDoChange( const Expr* operand )
{
// TODO Changing 'a->b++' to '++a->b' is technically the same, but the latter probably looks confusing,
// so either avoid that, or add parentheses. Avoid for now.
const Expr* expr = const_cast< Expr* >( operand )->IgnoreImplicit(); // does not have const version
switch( expr->getStmtClass())
{
case Stmt::ParenExprClass:
return true; // there are already parentheses, ok to move the ++
case Stmt::MemberExprClass:
return false; // ++a->b , avoid
case Stmt::DeclRefExprClass:
return true;
default:
{
report( DiagnosticsEngine::Fatal, "cannot analyze operator++ (plugin needs fixing)",
expr->getLocStart()) << operand->getSourceRange();
expr->dump();
operand->dump();
return false;
}
}
}
static Plugin::Registration< PostfixIncrementFix > X( "postfixincrementfix" );
} // namespace