e8b9bcf021
Because I want to make more symbols private, but that runs into a problem with the special symbol "typeinfo for Foo" which is required for dynamic_cast. For clang, we can use SAL_DLLPUBLIC_RTTI to make just that magic "typeinfo for Foo" symbol visible. But for gcc, we are left with no option but to make the whole class visible via <MODULE>_DLLPUBLIC. (I have a feature request logged against gcc to support something like that at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113958) But I also don't want to use <MODULE>_DLLPUBLIC, since that blocks progress of reducing symbol visibility for platforms other than gcc. So map SAL_DLLPUBLIC_RTTI to visiblity:default for gcc, which means that only gcc suffers the negative affects of not having that annotation. However, that runs into the problem that gcc does not like visibility:default in a couple of places, so I have to introduce some extra preprocessor stuff. Change-Id: Ib4fc5c1d2a1f8cf87d5159a4b5684137ec061605 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/164356 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
codemaker | ||
commoncpp | ||
commonjava | ||
cppumaker | ||
javamaker |