ea5641baee
Previously, all of the README files have been renamed to README.md and now, the contents of these files were changed to use Markdown format. Other than format inconsistency, some README.md files lacked information about modules, or were out of date. By using LibreOffice / OpenOffice wiki and other documentation websites, these files were updated. Now every README.md file has a title, and some description. The top-level README.md file is changed to add links to the modules. The result of processing the Markdown format README.md files can be seen at: https://docs.libreoffice.org/ Change-Id: Ic3b0c3c064a2498d6a435253b041df010cd7797a Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/113424 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@allotropia.de> Reviewed-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos <fitojb@ubuntu.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
source | ||
test | ||
util | ||
CppunitTest_stoc_uriproc.mk | ||
IwyuFilter_stoc.yaml | ||
Library_bootstrap.mk | ||
Library_introspection.mk | ||
Library_invocadapt.mk | ||
Library_invocation.mk | ||
Library_javaloader.mk | ||
Library_javavm.mk | ||
Library_namingservice.mk | ||
Library_proxyfac.mk | ||
Library_reflection.mk | ||
Library_stocservices.mk | ||
Makefile | ||
Module_stoc.mk | ||
README.md | ||
unosdk.mk |
Registries, Reflection, Introspection Implementation for UNO
The UNO types and services bootstrapping code is very old, and concepts are tightly knit together. Whenever you want to change something you risk backwards incompatibility. The code causes mental pain, and whenever you need to touch it you want to run away screaming. One typically ends up doing minimally invasive changes. That way, you have a chance of surviving the process. But you also pile up guilt.
At the heart of the matter there is the old binary "store" file structure
and the XRegistry
interface on top of it. At runtime, both all the UNO
type information (scattered across a number of binary .rdb
files) and
all the UNO service information (scattered across a number of .rdb
files
that used to be binary but have been mostly changed to XML now) are
represented by a single XRegistry
instance each.
The way the respective information is represented in the XRegistry
interface simply corresponds to the way the information is stored in the
binary .rdb
files. Those files are designed for storage of hierarchically
nested small blobs of information. Hence, for example information about
a UNO interface type com.sun.star.foo.XBar
is stored in a nested "folder"
with path com - sun - star - foo - XBar
, containing little blobs of
information about the type's ancestors, its methods, etc. Similarly
for information about instantiable services like com.sun.star.baz.Boz
.
As there are typically multiple .rdb
files containing types resp.
services (URE specific, LO specific, from extensions, ...), but they need
to be represented by a single XRegistry
instance, so "nested registries"
were invented. They effectively form a linear list of chaining XRegistry
instances together. Whenever a path needs to be looked up in the top-level
registry, it effectively searches through the linear list of nested
registries. All with the cumbersome UNO XRegistry
interface between
the individual parts. Horror.
When the XML service .rdb
s were introduced, we chickened out (see above
for rationale) and put them behind an XRegistry
facade, so that they
would seamlessly integrate with the existing mess. We postponed
systematic clean-up to the pie-in-the-sky days of LibreOffice 4 (or, "once we'll
become incompatible with OpenOffice.org," as the phrase used to be back then)